Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas tentang rangkap jabatan oleh notaris yang pengaturannya terdapat dalam Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 30 Tahun 2004. Larangan rangkap jabatan terhadap notaris sudah ada sebelum adanya Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris yaitu dalam Peraturan Jabatan Notaris (ord. stbl. 1860 no.3). Larangan tersebut bertujuan untuk menghindari terjadinya benturan kepentingan dan masalah-masalah hukum yang mungkin terjadi dan akan menyebabkan hilangnya kewibawaan dan profesionalisme seorang notaris. Akan tetapi, meskipun larangan tersebut sudah ada sejak lama namun pada kenyataannya masih saja ditemukan adanya notaris yang melakukan rangkap Jabatan. Di dalam kode etik profesipun disebutkan bahwa notaris harus mentaati Undang-undang yang berlaku. Sebagai sebuah profesi, jabatan notaris juga tidak boleh dirangkap dengan jabatan lain. Sehingga apabila masih ada notaris yang melakukan rangkap jabatan berarti ia telah melanggar Undang-undang, melanggar kode etik serta melanggar kriteria profesi menurut para ahli hukum. Masih adanya notaris yang melanggar aturan tentang rangkap jabatan, berkaitan erat dengan rendahnya nilai moral yang dimiliki oleh notaris tersebut. Selain itu pengaturan tentang rangkap jabatan yang terkesan masih setengah-setengah, sanksi yang tidak tegas, pengawasan yang tidak optimal terhadap notaris yang melakukan rangkap jabatan adalah alasan lainnya kenapa masih ada notaris yang melakukan rangkap jabatan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif artinya penelitian ini dilihat dari sisi normatif, yaitu penelitian terhadap keseluruhan data sekunder hukum.Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa perlu dilakukan revisi terhadap Undang-undang Jabatan Notaris terutama yang berkaitan dengan pengaturan rangkap jabatan yaitu apakah larangan rangkap jabatan ini akan tetap diterapkan atau dihapuskan saja agar tidak terkesan setengah-setengah dan tidak tegas.

---

ABSTRACT

The focus of this study is the regulation of double occupation by notary based on the Law of Notary?s Occupation Number 30 Year 2004. The prohibition of double occupation of Notary has been regulated since The Regulation of Notary Occupation (ord. stbl. 1860 no.3) was valid. This prohibition shows that the double occupation should have been prohibited. The aims of the prohibition are to avoid the possibility of conflict of interest and other problems of law that might happen which can reduce the dignity and professionalism of Notary. However, although the prohibition has been regulated since a long time ago but we still can find the notary with double occupation in reality. Based on profession rules a notary must also obey the law. As a profession, a notary must not also be doubled with other occupation. That is why, if there are still some notaries do a double occupation that means they have not obey the law, the rules, ethic code, and criteria of profession that should be had by a notary as the law expert said. The fact that there are still some notary who do not obey the law must be connected to the low of moral of the notary. Beside, the inconsistent regulation, the unclear sanction, the unoptimal supervision to notary who do a double occupation are other reasons why notary with double occupation can still be found. This research is a normative juridical research which means this research is reviewed from the normative side, which is a research to all Law secondary data.

The result of the research suggest that there must be a revision to the Law of Occupation of Notary especially the rules that connected to the regulation of double occupation whether it will still be applied or deleted in order to make the law more obvious and clear."

"Profesi seorang dokter merupakan profesi yang mulia, karena diharapkan dapat menyembuhkan pasien dari segala jenis penyakit, dengan anggapan bahwa tugas dokter dapat memperpanjang umur pasien atau setidaknya mengurangi penderitaan atas penyakit yang diderita. Oleh karena itu profesi dokter memiliki tanggung jawab yang berat dalam setiap praktik yang dilakukan. Pertanggungjawaban dokter mencakup pertanggungjawaban dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum atas hak-hak pasien terhadap dokter apabila melakukan kesalahan atau kelalaian dalam melakukan tindakan medik. Menurut Pasal 359, 360, 361 KUHP, dokter dianggap bersalah apabila dalam melakukan tindakan medik, dokter mengakibatkan pasien luka-luka atau meninggal. Berbeda dengan KUETP, menurut UU No:23 tahun 1992 tentang Kesehatan mempunyai pasal-pasal yang mengatur dengan tindakan disiplin dan ganti rugi bagi tenaga kesehatan, khususnya dalam hal ini dokter yang melakukan kesalahan atau kelalaian dalam melakukan tindakan medik. Namun UU No:23 tahun 1992 tentang kesehatan pada pasal-pasal ketentuan pidana tidak mengatur sanksi dan hukuman tentang kasus malapraktik. Dalam perkembangannya, muncullah UU No:29 tahun 2004 sebagai pelaksana UU No:23 tahun 1992. Melalui UU No: 29 tahun 2004 yang sangat diharapkan sebagai jawaban atas hak pasien dalam mendapatkan perlindungan hukum terhadap tindakan medik yang dilakukan oleh dokter, khususnya dalam kasus malapraktik. Tetapi harapan dirasakan belum dapat terwujudkan, karena UU No: 29 tahun 2004 pada pasal-pasal pidananya juga tidak mencantumkan pasal-pasal tentang hukuman/sanksi pidana terhadap dokter yang terbukti melakukan malapraktik."

"[ABSTRAKKetidaksesuaian ketrampilan telah menjadi masalah di pasar tenaga kerja di Indonesia. Berhubungan dengan hal tersebut, makalah ini menganalisis pengaruh kesesuaian antara jenis jurusan dan pekerjaan di pasar tenaga kerja. Indonesia akan menghadapi kelebihan pasokan populasi penduduk usia kerja, sehingga pemerintah membuat suatu kebijakan mengenai sekolah kejuruan. Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa relevansi antara ketrampilan dan pekerjaan meningkatkan pendapatan di pasar tenaga kerja. Penelitian in menggunakan data SAKERNAS 2013 dengan fokus terhadap analisis gender. Model empiris Mincer diaplikasikan sebagai basis untuk mengestimasi pengaruh tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lulusan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan yang jenis jurusan dan pekerjaannya sesuai menikmati gaji 13.5% lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang tidak sesuai. Efek ini tidak berbeda nyata secara statistik antara pria dan wanita. Selanjutnya, efek ini mencapai titik tertinggi pada awal karir di pasar tenaga kerja untuk pekerja pria, namun menunjukkan pengaruh pada pertengahan karir bagi para pekerja wanita. Hal ini mungkin dikarenakan perbedaan tingkat mobilitas antara pekerja pria dan wanita.Walaupun prosedur kesesuaian antara jurusan dan pekerjaan dimungkinkan menunjukkan hasil yang tidak signifikan, namun penelitian ini mendukung hasil beberapa penelitian sebelumnya mengenai kesesuaian jenis jurusan dan pekerjaan di pendidikan kejuruan. Walaupun demikian, penelitian ini juga memberikan bukti baru bagi pemerintah untuk memantau kebijakan pendidikan kejuruan karena masih menghasilkan ketidaksetaraan gender dalam memberikan pelatihan dan pekerjaan.

---

ABSTRACT

As skill mismatch has become the problem in the labor market in Indonesia, this paper examines the effect of the matching between vocational major and occupation in the labor market. Facing the excess supply of working age population, Indonesian government has imposed the vocational policy. Previous empirical evidences showed that the relevance returns of skill and occupation increases earnings in the labor market. The paper uses SAKERNAS 2013 data. A special focus will be on the role of gender. A basic Mincer model is applied to estimate the impact. The results show that the vocational graduates who have major and occupational matching enjoy 13.5% higher wages than those with mismatched. Meanwhile, this effect is not statistically different for males and females.

Furthermore, the effect reaches the highest point at the early career in the labor market for male workers, but in the middle of their working age for female workers. This may be due to the differences of the job mobility rate between men and women. Although the matching procedure may produce insignificant result, this research supported the prior studies on the major and occupational matching in vocational education. Nevertheless, this research provides novel evidence for the government to monitor the vocational education policies as it still generates gender inequality in providing training and job availability.

;As skill mismatch has become the problem in the labor market in Indonesia, this paper examines the effect of the matching between vocational major and occupation in the labor market. Facing the excess supply of working age population, Indonesian government has imposed the vocational policy. Previous empirical evidences showed that the relevance returns of skill and occupation increases earnings in the labor market. The paper uses SAKERNAS 2013 data. A special focus will be on the role of gender. A basic Mincer model is applied to estimate the impact. The results show that the vocational graduates who have major and occupational matching enjoy 13.5% higher wages than those with mismatched. Meanwhile, this effect is not statistically different for males and females.

Furthermore, the effect reaches the highest point at the early career in the labor market for male workers, but in the middle of their working age for female workers. This may be due to the differences of the job mobility rate between men and women. Although the matching procedure may produce insignificant result, this research supported the prior studies on the major and occupational matching in vocational education. Nevertheless, this research provides novel evidence for the government to monitor the vocational education policies as it still generates gender inequality in providing training and job availability.

;As skill mismatch has become the problem in the labor market in Indonesia, this paper examines the effect of the matching between vocational major and occupation in the labor market. Facing the excess supply of working age population, Indonesian government has imposed the vocational policy. Previous empirical evidences showed that the relevance returns of skill and occupation increases earnings in the labor market. The paper uses SAKERNAS 2013 data. A special focus will be on the role of gender. A basic Mincer model is applied to estimate the impact. The results show that the vocational graduates who have major and occupational matching enjoy 13.5% higher wages than those with mismatched. Meanwhile, this effect is not statistically different for males and females.

Furthermore, the effect reaches the highest point at the early career in the labor market for male workers, but in the middle of their working age for female workers. This may be due to the differences of the job mobility rate between men and women. Although the matching procedure may produce insignificant result, this research supported the prior studies on the major and occupational matching in vocational education. Nevertheless, this research provides novel evidence for the government to monitor the vocational education policies as it still generates gender inequality in providing training and job availability.

, As skill mismatch has become the problem in the labor market in Indonesia, this paper examines the effect of the matching between vocational major and occupation in the labor market. Facing the excess supply of working age population, Indonesian government has imposed the vocational policy. Previous empirical evidences showed that the relevance returns of skill and occupation increases earnings in the labor market. The paper uses SAKERNAS 2013 data. A special focus will be on the role of gender. A basic Mincer model is applied to estimate the impact. The results show that the vocational graduates who have major and occupational matching enjoy 13.5% higher wages than those with mismatched. Meanwhile, this effect is not statistically different for males and females.

Furthermore, the effect reaches the highest point at the early career in the labor market for male workers, but in the middle of their working age for female workers. This may be due to the differences of the job mobility rate between men and women. Although the matching procedure may produce insignificant result, this research supported the prior studies on the major and occupational matching in vocational education. Nevertheless, this research provides novel evidence for the government to monitor the vocational education policies as it still generates gender inequality in providing training and job availability.

]"