Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji pengaruh struktur kepemilikan, efektivitas dewan komisaris, dan efektivitas komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan. Struktur kepemilikan dihitung melalui dua kepemilikan saham yaitu institusional dan manajerial. Efektivitas dewan komisaris dihitung dengan mengadopsi penelitian Hermawan 2009 dengan melihat independensi, aktivitas, ukuran, dan kompetensi dari dewan komisaris. Efektivitas komite audit diukur dengan melihat latar belakang pendidikan dan frekuensi rapat komite audit. Nilai perusahaan dihitung dengan menggunakan Tobin's Q. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan regresi berganda 412 sampel perusahaan listed di BEI tahun 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan saham institusional dan manajerial, efektivitas dewan komisaris, dan efektivitas komite audit tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.

---

The objective of this research is to examine the effect of ownership structure, board of commissioner, and audit committee to firm value. Institutional and managerial ownerships are two methods used to measure ownership structure. Board of Commissioner activity is measured by it's independence, activity, size, and competence based on Hermawan 2009. Audit committee activity is measured by educational background and number of meetings. The firm value is measured with Tobin's Q. Based on 412 companies that are listed in Indonesia's Stock Exchange BEI in 2014, the empirical study with multiple regression shows that institutional and managerial ownerships, board effectivity, and audit committee effectivity has no significant effect to firm value."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi pedoman komite audit sektor publik di Kementerian Keuangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus kualitatif, termasuk analisis dokumen primer dan wawancara terstruktur dan semi terstruktur pada Komite Audit dan Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Keuangan. Dengan menggunakan pedoman best practice Audit and Risk Assurance Committee Handbook dari H.M. Treasury dan Independent Audit Committee in Public Sector Organizations dari IIA sebagai tolok ukur, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Kementerian Keuangan telah membentuk komite audit sesuai dengan pedoman yang mengatur tentang elemen dan prinsip komite audit sektor publik. Hasil penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa masih terdapat ruang perbaikan untuk menyempurnakan implementasi, terkait dengan mandat, komposisi, persyaratan kapabilitas, peran dan tanggung jawab, kinerja, serta komunikasi dan pelaporan komite audit di sektor publik berdasarkan pedoman best practice. Penelitian ini juga memberikan gambaran atas ruang perbaikan yang dapat dilaksanakan dalam perwujudan mandat Komite Audit Kementerian Keuangan. Penelitian ini dapat menjadi salah satu referensi dalam membuat peraturan dan pedoman pembentukan komite audit pada organisasi sektor publik (pemerintah) sesuai dengan tata kelola sektor publik.

---

While prior studies on audit committees have focused on the private sector, this is the first research on audit committees focusing on the public sector in Indonesia. This paper aims to evaluate the implementation public sector audit committee guidelines in Ministry of Finance Audit Committee as government. This paper utilizes a case study approach, including analysis of primary documents, also structured and semi-structured interviews the Ministry of Finance Audit Committee and parties directly involved. Using best practice guidelines for public sector audit committees, namely H.M. Treasury's Audit and Risk Assurance Committee Handbook and the IIA's Independent Audit Committees in Public Sector Organizations as benchmarks, this paper finds that Ministry of Finance established an audit committee in accordance with the guidelines governing the principles and elements of public sector audit committees. Nonetheless, there is still room for improvement to refine the implementation of the audit committee. This research is expected to provide recommendations for the improvement of regulations related to the mandate, composition, capability requirements, role and responsibility, performance, also communicate and reporting of the Audit Committee in the public sector based on the best practice guidelines. This research also provides an overview of the room for improvement that can be implemented in realizing the mandate of the Ministry of Finance Audit Committee. This research can also be a reference in making regulations and guidelines for the formation of audit committees in public sector organizations (government) in accordance with public sector governance."

"Studi ini meneliti pengaruh karateristik komite di bawah Dewan Komisaris terhadap lindung nilai dan nilai perusahaan pada perusahaan non finansial di Indonesia pada tahun 2015-2021 dengan mengukur karateristik Komite Audit dan keberadaan Komite Pemantau Manajemen Risiko. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa komposisi anggota Komite Audit yang memiliki latar belakang akuntansi dan/ atau keuangan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap lindung nilai, sementara rapat dan jumlah anggota Komite Audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan. Komite Audit dengan kompetensi anggota keuangan dan/atau akuntansi lebih tinggi akan lebih konservatif dimana melihat peningkatan lindung nilai akan mengurangi eksposur risiko perusahaan. Keberadaan Komite Pemantau Manajemen Risiko berpengaruh negatif secara signifikan terhadap lindung nilai perusahaan, dimana perusahaan dengan Komite Pemantau Manajemen Risiko mampu mengidentifikasi risiko dengan lebih baik sehingga perusahaan dapat menentukan cara yang tepat untuk memitigasi risiko, dimana tidak semua risiko dapat dimitigasi dengan lindung nilai. Lindung nilai yang dilakukan perusahaan memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Ini menunjukan bahwa lindung nilai hanya digunakan sebagai strategi manajemen risiko, bukan sebagai strategi yang dapat meningkatkan nilai perusahaan.

---

This study examines the effect of the characteristic of committee under board of commissioner on hedging and firm value in Indonesia’s non-financial firm within the period of 2015-2021 by measuring the characteristics of audit committee and the presence of risk oversight committee (ROC). Our findings shows that composition of audit committee members that have financial and/or accounting background have a significantly positive effect on hedging, meanwhile meetings and size of audit committee is insignificant. Audit committee with higher composition of member with financial and/or accounting background is more conservative where see increase of hedging will reduce risk exposure. The presence of ROC has negative and significant effect on firm hedging. Firm with ROC is more capable in identifying risk so that firm can determine the most appropriate way to mitigate risk, where not all risk can be mitigated by hedging. Furthermore, hedging has a positive but insignificant effect on firm value. This finding shows that hedging only used as a risk management strategy, not as a strategy that can increase firm value."

"Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh probabilitas perilaku direksi yang ada di dalam elemen Fraud Hexagon terhadap indikasi terjadinya Fraud Laporan Keuangan (FLK), serta menguji peran komite audit dalam memperlemah pengaruh perilaku direksi tersebut. Model analisis yang digunakan adalah regresi logit logistik dengan data seluruh perusahaan non-keuangan di Indonesia tahun 2016-2020. Penelitian ini juga melakukan uji sensitivitas dengna melakukan uji beda koefisien yang didasarkan pada seberapa banyak komponen laporan keuangan yang dimanipulasi menggunakan Overall Manipulation Index. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa probabilitas direksi melakukan FLK semakin tinggi ketika direksi memiliki stimulus yang tinggi, peluang memanfaatkan kecurangan yang besar, serta kapabilitas yang tinggi untuk mengeksekusi kecurangan tersebut. Sebaliknya, direksi yang terindikasi melakukan FLK tidak mempertimbangkan rasionalisasi atas kecurangan yang dilakukan serta tidak memanfaatkan jaringan kolusi yang dimiliki. Menariknya, direksi yang berego tinggi justru cenderung untuk tidak melakukan FLK. Temuan lainnya dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa komite audit mampu meminimalisir kecenderungan direksi melakukan FLK apabila direksi memiliki stimulus yang tinggi, peluang yang besar, serta kapabilitas yang tinggi. Sebaliknya, komite audit tidak mampu meminimalisir probabilitas direksi dalam melakukan FLK apabila direksi memiliki rasionalisasi dan ego yang tinggi, serta jaringan kolusi yang besar.

---

This study examines the effect of the probability of the behavior of directors in the Fraud Hexagon element on the indications of Fraud Financial Statements (FLK). It also examines the audit committee's role in weakening the influence of the behavior of the directors. The analytical model used is logistic logit regression with data on all non-financial companies in Indonesia in 2016-2020. This study also conducted a sensitivity test by conducting a different coefficient test based on how many components of the financial statements were manipulated using the Overall Manipulation Index. The findings of this study indicate that the probability of directors committing FLK is higher when the directors have a high stimulus, ample opportunities to take advantage of fraud, and a high capability to execute the fraud. On the other hand, directors indicated to have committed FLK do not consider the rationalization of the fraud committed and do not take advantage of the collusion network they have. Interestingly, directors with high egos tend not to do FLK. Other findings in this study indicate that the audit committee can minimize the tendency of directors to conduct FLK if the directors have high stimulus, great opportunities, and high capabilities. On the other hand, the audit committee cannot minimize the probability of the board of directors performing FLK if the board of directors has high rationalization and ego and an extensive network of collusion."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh strukturkepemilikan perusahaan yang memiliki hubungan grup afiliasi terhadap nilaiperusahaan. Efektivitas dewan komisaris dan komite audit juga diikutsertakanpada penelitian sebagai pemoderasi interaksi grup afiliasi dengan nilaiperusahaan. Efektivitas dewan komisaris dan komite audit diukur berdasarkanpenelitian Hermawan (2009). Sampel penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitianini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan manufkatur yang terdaftar di Bursa EfekIndonesia pada periode tahun 2008-2012 dan terpilih 69 perusahaan yang menjadisampel. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa grup afiliasi berpengaruh negatifdan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kemudian efektivitas dewan komisarisdan komite audit semakin memperkuat hubungan negatif grup afiliasi terhadapnilai perusahaan.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to examine empirically the effect of ownershipstructure which has relation to group affiliation to firm value, and the roleeffectiveness of board of commisioners and audit committee. The effectiveness ofboard of commisioners and audit committee is measured based on Hermawan(2009). The research samples are firms in manufacturing industry from 2008-2012. This research give evidence that the group aflliation has significant negativeeffect on firm value. Then the effectiveness of board of commissioners and auditcommittee strengthen (increase) the negative effect of group affiliation on firmvalue."

"[ ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh earnings management terhadapstock return dengan kualitas audit dan efektivitas komite audit sebagai variabelpemoderasi. Earnings Management diukur menggunakan akrual diskresioner denganmenggunakan model Modified Jones. Stock Return diukur dengan menggunakanimbal hasil saham kumulatif. Kualitas audit diproksikan dengan variabel dummy Big4 atau non Big 4 dan efektivitas komite audit diproksikan dengan menggunakanjumlah rapat yang dilakukan dalam satu tahun. Penelitian ini dilakukan denganmenggunakan sampel perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar pada Bursa EfekIndonesia untuk periode 2012-2014 dengan menggunakan metode purposivesampling. Dalam penelitian ini diuji mengenai bagaimana hubungan antara earningsmanagement dan stock return, dan bagaimana pengaruh kualitas audit dan efektivitaskomite audit terhadap hubungan tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwaearnings management memiliki hubungan negatif signifikan dengan stock return.Sedangkan hasil pengujian varibael pemoderasi menunjukkan bahwa kualitas auditmampu memoderasi hubungan earnings management dan stock return denganmemperlemah hubungan negatif, begitu pula dengan efektivitas komite auditmemoderasi dengan memperlemah hubungan negatif.;

---

ABSTRACT This study aimed to analyze the influence of earnings management in stock return

with audit quality and effectiveness audit committee as a moderating variabel.

Earnings management as measured by discretionary accruals estimated using the

cross-sectional Modified Jones model. Audit quality is measured by dummy variabel

audit firm size, Big 4 or non Big 4. Effectiveness audit committee is measured by

number of meeting audit committee in one year. Sampel of this study is

manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2014 by

using purposive sampling method. In this study examine how influence of earnings

management on stock return, and how audit quality and effectiveness audit committee

can moderate influence of earnings management on stock return. The result of this

study showed that earnings management negatively affect stock return. Audit quality

and the effectiveness of audit committee can moderate with weaken the relationship

negatively earnings management with stock return.; This study aimed to analyze the influence of earnings management in stock return

with audit quality and effectiveness audit committee as a moderating variabel.

Earnings management as measured by discretionary accruals estimated using the

cross-sectional Modified Jones model. Audit quality is measured by dummy variabel

audit firm size, Big 4 or non Big 4. Effectiveness audit committee is measured by

number of meeting audit committee in one year. Sampel of this study is

manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2014 by

using purposive sampling method. In this study examine how influence of earnings

management on stock return, and how audit quality and effectiveness audit committee

can moderate influence of earnings management on stock return. The result of this

study showed that earnings management negatively affect stock return. Audit quality

and the effectiveness of audit committee can moderate with weaken the relationship

negatively earnings management with stock return.; This study aimed to analyze the influence of earnings management in stock return

with audit quality and effectiveness audit committee as a moderating variabel.

Earnings management as measured by discretionary accruals estimated using the

cross-sectional Modified Jones model. Audit quality is measured by dummy variabel

audit firm size, Big 4 or non Big 4. Effectiveness audit committee is measured by

number of meeting audit committee in one year. Sampel of this study is

manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2014 by

using purposive sampling method. In this study examine how influence of earnings

management on stock return, and how audit quality and effectiveness audit committee

can moderate influence of earnings management on stock return. The result of this

study showed that earnings management negatively affect stock return. Audit quality

and the effectiveness of audit committee can moderate with weaken the relationship

negatively earnings management with stock return.; This study aimed to analyze the influence of earnings management in stock return

with audit quality and effectiveness audit committee as a moderating variabel.

Earnings management as measured by discretionary accruals estimated using the

cross-sectional Modified Jones model. Audit quality is measured by dummy variabel

audit firm size, Big 4 or non Big 4. Effectiveness audit committee is measured by

number of meeting audit committee in one year. Sampel of this study is

manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2014 by

using purposive sampling method. In this study examine how influence of earnings

management on stock return, and how audit quality and effectiveness audit committee

can moderate influence of earnings management on stock return. The result of this

study showed that earnings management negatively affect stock return. Audit quality

and the effectiveness of audit committee can moderate with weaken the relationship

negatively earnings management with stock return., This study aimed to analyze the influence of earnings management in stock return

with audit quality and effectiveness audit committee as a moderating variabel.

Earnings management as measured by discretionary accruals estimated using the

cross-sectional Modified Jones model. Audit quality is measured by dummy variabel

audit firm size, Big 4 or non Big 4. Effectiveness audit committee is measured by

number of meeting audit committee in one year. Sampel of this study is

manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2014 by

using purposive sampling method. In this study examine how influence of earnings

management on stock return, and how audit quality and effectiveness audit committee

can moderate influence of earnings management on stock return. The result of this

study showed that earnings management negatively affect stock return. Audit quality

and the effectiveness of audit committee can moderate with weaken the relationship

negatively earnings management with stock return.]"