Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Sektor industri makanan dan minuman banyak menyerap tenaga kerja, demikian juga dengan sumbangan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi. Meskipun demikian dalam lima tahun terakhir belum diketahui secara akurat peran investasi dalam menciptakan Nilai Tambah Bruto (NTB) dan komponen-komponennya serta Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja. Permasalahan yang akan analisis berapa besar peran investasi sektor industri makanan dan minuman dalam menciptakan 1) NTB 2) komponen-komponen NTB 3) penyerapan tenaga kerja 4) import content 5) berapa besar backward lingkage dan forward lingkage. Metode dan data diolah dengan analisis I-O 66 sektor tahun dasar 2010. Investasi di sektor industri makanan dan minuman periode 2007-2012 ratarata sebesar Rp 14.177.418,- juta, terbukti dapat memenciptakan NTB riil sebesar Rp 5.814.671,- atau NTB nominal sebesar Rp 6.242.662,- juta. Elastisitas investasi terhadap NTB sebesar 1,82, surplus usaha sebesar Rp 3.458.153,- juta, upah tenaga kerja sebesar Rp 1.962.009,- juta, pajak tak langsung sebesar Rp 385.902,- juta dan penyusutan sebesar Rp 436.598,-,- juta serta penyerapan tenaga kerja sebanyak 56.347 orang per tahun. Elastisitas penyerapan tenaga kerja sebesar 1,03. Import content di sektor bersangkutan sebesar 5,9% dan indeks daya penyebaran sektor bersangkutan sebesar 1,3 serta indeks derajat kepekaan sebesar 1 (satu) artinya sektor tersebut mempunyai kemampuan cukup besar mendorong sektor hulunya dan meningkatkan pertumbuhan output sektor hilirnya. Peran investasi disektor industri makanan dan minuman berkontribusi besar terhadap pendapatan nasional dan keternakerjaan, yang berimplikasi cukup baik pada ketahanan nasional. Tetapi import content yang cukup besar bila tidak dicermati dapat memperlemah ketahanan nasional.

---

The sector of food and beverage industry absorb more labors and contribute to economic growth. In last five years, there were no researchs yet about the role of investment in creating gross value added (GVA) as well as labor absorption. The research question are : (1) How much rupiahs were the effect on invesment in the food and beverage industrial sector on gross value added (GVA) and its components, (2) How many labors were absorbed in the sector due to investment in this sector. The methods used in this research was I-O data analysis, 66 sectors and the year 2010 as the base year. The result shows: (1) In the periode 2007?2012 investment the sector of food and beverages created real GVA Rp 5,814,671 million per year, with elasticity 1.82. (2). Labor absorbtion due to investment in those sector were 56,347 per year, with elasticity 1.03 The role of investment in food and beverage industrial sector gave high contribution toward national income dan employment, which have good implication on national defence. While, high import content if no observed can weaken national defence."

"

---

ABSTRACTBilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation organizes, summarizes and comments upon the arbitral awards interpreting and applying BIT provisions. Policymakers and practitioners will find a thorough introduction to the operation of the BITs, including the principal arguments and case authorities on both sides of the major issues in international investment law. The book is intended to be a single-volume reference covering every important development in the 50 years of BIT programs worldwide, from 1959 until 2009.Author Kenneth Vandevelde argues that the primary purpose of the BITs is to promote the application of the rule of law to foreign investment, while a secondary purpose is to create a liberal investment regime. He further argues that BITs are based on six core principles: reasonableness, security, nondiscrimination, access, transparency and due process. The book explains each of these principles and analyzes the major BIT provisions based on them. Vandevelde addresses the host of complex questions that BITs engender: Do bilateral investment treaties attract foreign investment or otherwise contribute to economic development? Do BITs limit host state regulatory discretion too much? Why should countries continue to conclude BITs? What is meant by BIT guarantees of "fair and equitable treatment" and "full protection and security"? What is the scope of the BIT provision for most-favored-nation treatment? The book's expert analysis of these questions makes it useful to policy makers in the area of international economic relations, attorneys representing multinational companies, and anyone interested in the process of economic globalization."