Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh manajemen program akselerasi dan motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi dan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa yang mengikuti program akselerasi yang berjumlah 90 orang dari 2 sekolah yaitu SMAN 2 dan SMAN 3 Kota Tangerang Selatan. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner yang didukung oleh observasi dan wawancara. Analisis data menggunakan analisis Korelasi Rank Spearman. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh variabel manajemen program akselerasi terhadap variabel prestasi belajar siswa sebesar 42,4%. Selanjutnya pengaruh variabel motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa mencapai 48.4%. Hasil perhitungan ini menunjukkan pengaruh motivasi belajar lebih besar dibandingkan dengan manajemen program akselerasi. Hasil ini mengindikasikan perubahan pada prestasi belajar siswa lebih dominan dipengaruhi oleh motivasi belajar dibandingkan manajemen program akselerasi. Pengaruh positif dari kedua variabel terhadap prestasi belajar siswa program akselerasi menunjukkan bahwa perbaikan pada manajemen program akselerasi dan motivasi belajar akan memberikan dampak signifikan terhadap prestasi belajar siswa program akselerasi. Total pengaruh dari kedua variabel manajemen program akselerasi dan motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa mencapai 90,8%, sedangkan sebesar 9,2% dipengaruhi oleh variabel lain yang tidak diteliti dalam penelitian ini.

---

This research aim to know the influence of Acceleration Program Management and Learning Motivation for Student Achievement. This study uses a quantitative approach. Population and sample in this research were students in the accelerated program, amounting to 90 people from two schools, namely SMAN 2 and 3 South Tangerang City. Instrument used in this study is a questionnaire which is supported by observations and interviews. Analysis of data using Rank Spearman Correlation analysis. The analysis showed that the influence of the accelerated program management variable on student achievement variables by 42,4%. Meanwhile, motivation to study variable influence the student achievement reached 48,4%.

The results of these calculations show the influence of motivation to learn is greater than the acceleration program management. These results indicate a change in student achievement is more dominant than the motivation to learn is affected by the accelerated program management. Positive influence of both variables on student achievement suggests that the accelerated program management improvement in acceleration and motivation program will provide a significant impact on student achievement in accelerated program. The total effect of these two variables (acceleration program management and motivation of student achievement) reached 90,8%, while for 9,2% influenced by other variables not examined in this study."

"This volume focuses on the rise of educational regulation and educational governance in a post-2015 era. Across the globe, unfettered globalization is being curtailed and cooperation and collaboration at the regional level appears to be at an unprecedented high, yet there are still substantial disparities across national levels in education, social, political, and economic sectors. This volume investigates the nexus between national policy mandates, regional aspirations and international benchmarks and commitments. In doing so, it uses a critical educational policy studies approach to examine the various scales of the politics of education to explain how changes in the global and political economy influences national educational policies and practices. Thus, the politics of education within small (and micro) states is linked to various educational agenda settings and attitudes within the national and regional policy environment and the actors and institutions that shape these agendas. Chapters within this volume explain at what scale policy decisions are taken within the policy environment and who has the authoritative allocation of values."